Green spaces in housing developments are areas designated for parks and natural landscapes to enhance residents' quality of life and environmental health. Proponents argue that it enhances community well-being and environmental quality. Opponents argue that it increases the cost of housing and developers should decide the layout of their projects.
@B4SJGL42mos2MO
Yes, but mandated spaces should instead be wildlife corridors and undeveloped land, in order to facilitate native life
@B4RNT9C2mos2MO
Yes, but residential allotments should be large enough to allow for yard space as well instead of putting profits above livability by cramming as many allotments in as they can at a premium price.
@B4GTKPN2mos2MO
Studies show human beings benefit greatly from being around nature immediately and in the long term. It is a balance between practicality and finances but yes, when applicable they should.
No, new developments should be required to contribute financially to road infrastructure projects that support the increased traffic.
@B3CKLNK3mos3MO
Yes, but only if there is no green spaces nearby, their doesn't need to be a park and/or oval in every housing estate
@B32D8FK4mos4MO
They should also provide enough space for passive solar design, to make it possible to build sustainable houses.
@9SYC4SQ9mos9MO
PUBLIC (government-funded and community-built) HOUSING ONLY. ABOLISH PRIVATE PROPERTY (private development for houses is now just another investment, housing is no longer treated as a vital human right).
@9SWQZYBDavid Pocock9mos9MO
No, incentivise high density living and protect existing nature instead
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
Join in on more popular conversations.