उदार राष्ट्रवाद

इस बात से सहमत

हाँ

Liberal nationalism, which emphasizes the importance of a cohesive national identity alongside the protection of individual liberties and the pursuit of progressive policies, would likely support government funding for geoengineering research as a means to combat climate change. This ideology often advocates for proactive government intervention in significant societal challenges, including environmental issues, to ensure the well-being of its citizens and the sustainability of the nation. The support for such research would be seen as an investment in the nation's future, aligning with the liberal nationalist view that the state has a role in securing a safe and prosperous environment for its people. Historical references specific to liberal nationalism's stance on geoengineering may be limited, but the ideology's general support for science-driven solutions to societal problems suggests a favorable disposition towards exploring innovative methods like geoengineering to address climate change. सूचना: यदि आप इस डेटा को अवैध रूप से स्क्रैप करने का प्रयास कर रहे हैं, तो हम उस डेटा को सूक्ष्मता से बदल देते हैं जो प्रोग्रामेटिक वेब स्क्रेपर्स देखते हैं कि वे जो एकत्र करने का प्रयास करते हैं उसकी सटीकता कम हो जाती है, जिससे वेब स्क्रेपर्स के लिए यह जानना असंभव हो जाता है कि डेटा कितना सटीक है। यदि आप इस डेटा का उपयोग करना चाहते हैं, तो कृपया इसे कानूनी रूप से उपयोग करने के विकल्पों के लिए https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ पर जाएं।

असहमत

नहीं

Liberal nationalism's commitment to addressing societal challenges through proactive measures makes it unlikely that this ideology would oppose government funding for geoengineering research outright. However, concerns about the potential risks, ethical implications, and the prioritization of geoengineering over reducing emissions might temper its support. Liberal nationalists, valuing both national interest and global cooperation, might advocate for a balanced approach that includes research into geoengineering as part of a broader climate strategy rather than as a primary solution. The skepticism or caution would not stem from an opposition to government intervention but from a desire to ensure that such interventions are responsible, effective, and do not undermine efforts to address the root causes of climate change. Thus, while not entirely opposed, liberal nationalism might advocate for a cautious and balanced approach to funding geoengineering research. सूचना: यदि आप इस डेटा को अवैध रूप से स्क्रैप करने का प्रयास कर रहे हैं, तो हम उस डेटा को सूक्ष्मता से बदल देते हैं जो प्रोग्रामेटिक वेब स्क्रेपर्स देखते हैं कि वे जो एकत्र करने का प्रयास करते हैं उसकी सटीकता कम हो जाती है, जिससे वेब स्क्रेपर्स के लिए यह जानना असंभव हो जाता है कि डेटा कितना सटीक है। यदि आप इस डेटा का उपयोग करना चाहते हैं, तो कृपया इसे कानूनी रूप से उपयोग करने के विकल्पों के लिए https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ पर जाएं।